Transcription Gap: through September 8 issue (not by DGR)
Transcription Gap: intial section (not by DGR)
We were present some days back at the private
view of Mr. Madox Brown pictures,
some of which
have since been sent to the Exhibition of the Liver-
pool Academy for
1856. The two principal pictures
are works of great power, and one in
particular,
entitled “The Last of
England,” possesses such
national interest in the subject, in addition
to its sur-
passing merits as a work of art, that we cannot let it
pass even at
present, without some record, as it
has not yet been publicly exhibited in
London.
The false relations of artists and the pub-
lic produced by the mismanagement
of existing
exhibiting bodies in London, must surely be evident
enough when we see
works of real genius produced
here, and in which the London public have a prior
claim
of enjoyment, finding their way by preference
to a provincial exhibition. Former cases
indicative
of honourable impartiality displayed by the Liver-
pool Academy have
assured artists that there is a fair
field open for them in that town.
“The Last of England” is an
historical picture in
the truest sense of the term. It is a contemporary
chronicle of
the year of the great Australian emigra-
tion, the results of which are even now matter
of
anxiety and expectation to all of us. The most pro-
minent figures of the numerous
groups in the picture
are a young married couple of the middle class. Young
as they
are, life appears before them now with all
its stern reality. He is seeking a sphere for
his
energies in a new land—a happy home for the
dear one who clings
lovingly and anxiously to him.
An ocean which may whelm them in its
treacherous
depths lies between them and their future. For the
moment, however, these
aspirations and anxieties are
silent. Those white receding cliffs are to their
eyes
“the Last of England[.]” It is of that only
that he
thinks. It is with that and with him that her
thoughts are occupied. There
are disappointments
and resentments in the look of bitterness which the
thoughtful
and active man bends on the land that he
is leaving. His hand dark with cold lies in that
of
his wife, who, with the other, holds the baby close to
her, under her great grey
shawl. They sit together
at the poop muffled up carefully as a protection
against the
wind, with an open umbrella
tightly tucked under the man's left arm, the hand
of
which is thrust into his breast. The spray standing
on the umbrella spreading over
the lady, and on the
tarpaulin which protects her knees, is wonderfully
painted.
Indeed there is no point of expression or
effect of colour, from the anxious look on her
beauti-
ful countenance to such details as those just men-
tioned, that is in the
slightest degree slurred over.
It may here be observed that the whole
picture—we
mean not merely the accessory parts but the
figures
themselves—has been painted under the open sky.
This is a labour
much greater than would readily be
imagined. It involves immense forethought
and
preparation to insure success, and has hardly
ever been attempted before, even in
the pic-
tures of the new naturalistic school. Never-
theless, without this, neither
strong mind nor
skilful hand would have availed the artist to obtain
that
“everlasting wash of air,” as Browning calls
it,
the effect of open-air daylight. It enters every fold
of the thick shawl, and
within it, where in warm corners
we discern the little baby's cherished hand or foot.
It
creeps round the green and purple cabbages, swaying
at the lee-side round the
weather-quarter boat, to
the expanse of green sea and the distant steamer.
It finds
its way between the figures that crowd the
deck behind the young couple, revealing every
detail
of expression and costume in the blackguard who,
hugging his bottle, shakes
the free fist at the mother
country fast fading away, and who would shake it as
soon
at the mother who bore him, and who is now
trying to drag down the arm from its position
of
impiety. The daylight shows us everything
in these and many other
figures—work-seekers, and
work-shunners, and helpless children. Not one
of
these is a mere stock personage, a lay figure. Each
one comes living from the
painter's mind. We dwell
especially on the admirable truth of out-door light
because
it is a quality which can only be got, to this
degree, by really painting each figure and
accessory
from nature, and out of doors. Contrast this with the
conventions of studio
light and asphaltum, into which
even such a painter as Wilkie coud fall in his
open-air
pictures, and then say whether the extra labour of
the painter is not repaid
by the increased delight of
the spectator. This picture is, we understand, al-
ready
sold to Mr. Windus, of Tottenham, the pos-
essor of many leading works of the English
school,
both old and new.
We shall not dwell upon the other picture to which
we have alluded, although it
is in some respects more
important than that which we have described. This,
the
subject of which is “Christ washing
Peter's
feet,” was exhibited some years back, and was the
subject
of much attention at the time. Although
very unfairly hung, it attracted much admiration
as
a work of great originality and deep as well as bril-
liant colour. The author has
bestowed further
thought and labour upon it, and has removed the
grounds for some
objections made to it. The tri-
umph of the picture is the noble embodiment of
a
powerful and reverent nature in the figure of Peter.
We have not spoken of Mr. Brown's landscapes,
two of the most exquisite specimens
of which we saw
in his studio. They are thoroughly English in their
character, and
are finished with a degree of truthful
elaboration which we have never seen
surpassed.
The works we allude to are entitled, “A
Hayfield
after Sunset,” and “An English
Autumn Afternoon.”
The former of these works, which is the smaller
of
the two, is remarkable for the accuracy of its details,
the evident approach of
the twilight, the deep repose
which is stealing solemnly and slowly over the
whole
scene. The sun has set, but his light has not yet all
departed, and the cold
bright moon in the blue sky
has not yet taken the lights and shades entirely
under
its own keeping. The effect is perfect. The “Autumn
Afternoon,” painted during two autumns in the open
air,
is distinguished for the richness of colour and
abundance of all the elements of a
land-
scape perfectly English. The sun-light effect is
peculiarly admirable. The way
in which the painter
has managed large rich flashes of brilliant colour is
artistic
in the highest degree. Scarcely less worthy
of remark is a “View of Windermere.” The large
mass of green in the foreground is
dotted with cattle,
and the waters of the lake spread smoothly away in
the distance,
almost blending with the sky. One of
the leading features of these pictures is their
intensely
English character.
The Liverpool Academy, to which the works first
alluded to have been sent, may be
congratulated on
its present position in relation to the rising art of the
day. Its
independent homage, in the award of its
prizes, to the merits of some of our younger
artists—
such as Holman Hunt and Anthony—at a time when
the
tide of prejudice seemed to have set in against
them pretty strongly in London, has
directed atten-
tion to the Liverpool body as possessing both judg-
ment and
fairness, and will serve no doubt, as in the
case of Mr. Madox Brown, to draw annually
to
their exhibition some of the best works produced
among us.
Transcription Gap: remainder of page (not by DGR)
Transcription Gap: remainder of issue (not by DGR)
Transcription Gap: remainder of volume (not by DGR)